On a Pastime

Winston Churchill found himself between government jobs in the period between the world wars. World War I had not been kind to Churchill, and, finding himself temporarily out of politics, he took up a hobby. As many of you probably know, that hobby was painting. Churchill was never a great artist, of course, but that really wasn’t the point, now was it? Painting was a way to occupy his time, a hobby, something creative at a time when he felt his political and even personal creativity had been drained from him, and before he became the great statesman that World War II would make him. Churchill wrote about his artistic endeavors in a well-received book; he was, after all, a much better author than he was a painter. “We cannot aspire to masterpieces,” he wrote, “we may content ourselves with a joy-ride in a paint box.”

That “joy-ride” that Churchill referred to inspired another recent retiree to take up the hobby for himself. He, too, found himself at a low point, bored, and no longer occupied with life away from home. His wife, seeing that her husband was atrophying mentally, suggested a hobby. Having recently read Churchill’s book on painting, this retiree decided to give that hobby a try. The problem was, well, he’d never touched a paintbrush, even to paint something as simple as a wall. He knew who Bob Ross was, but he wasn’t so interested in landscapes and what he felt was a fast and easy way to learn how to paint. No, he wanted to “do it right,” so, he hired a professional artist to come to his house and give him lessons.

The person this retiree hired is named Bonnie Flood. She was an artist and had owned several art galleries over the years. She supported herself by selling her art and by giving private painting lessons. And she came highly recommended. The issue here was that Flood is from Cumming, Georgia, and the retired man lived in Florida (Florida–God’s waiting room). Now, this particular retiree was a man of means, so when Flood protested that she didn’t live near him, the man offered to provide a place for her to stay while she gave him lessons for a month. And he seemed to charming and friendly on the phone. So, Flood agreed to go down to Florida and teach the retiree what she knew about painting.

At their first meeting, the man was so eager to begin that he could hardly contain himself. “There’s a Rembrandt trapped in this body,” he gushed, “and it’s your job to find it.” This made Flood smile. But she looked at him and decided that he wasn’t kidding completely. He really wanted to learn to paint well. And so, the older retire and the younger artist began an unlikely collaboration. Flood thought she would work with him for an hour or two a day and then have the rest of the time to see things in Florida. She was wrong. The man asked for six hours of instruction per day for the entire month. She wasn’t complaining. The pay was great, and she was doing something she loved.

The man worked quickly and learned just as quickly. He was impatient to learn and to become better at the hobby. He began by trying to paint animals like pets and horses, but he really wanted to paint portraits. Flood tried to temper his expectations by saying that painting took time. He would smile and nod and continue to work tirelessly, day after day, hour after hour. When the month had passed, Flood could honestly say she was impressed. For someone who had never painted, never done anything artistic, the man had a primitive but forceful style that was, ultimately, not too bad for an amateur. She was impressed with his enthusiasm and his focus. They’d spent so many hours together that Flood was sad their time was over. She felt proud that he’d come so far so fast.

Since 2013 when Flood taught him, this man has continued to paint and was able to publish a book with several of his portrait paintings in it. It became a best-seller. And in it, George W. Bush credits Bonnie Flood for bringing out his inner Rembrandt.

On a Second Act

F. Scott Fitzgerald famously said that, in America, there are no “second acts,” meaning that we usually get only one chance to make it, succeed, achieve, and you get no do-overs. He was wrong. History, especially American History, is filled with second-chancers who remade themselves, sometimes again and again. It’s one of the remarkable things about the US.

Take the story of Anna Robertson. She was born the year before the American Civil War began, in 1860, in a rural area of New York near the Vermont border. Anna’s family was poor, and, at the age of 12, Anna was “hired out” to live with another family as a servant. It was a position she would hold for the next 15 years of her life. At age 27, she met another hired hand who worked on the same farm she did, a man named Thomas, and the pair married and set up housekeeping in Virginia. The couple continued to follow work around that area, moving often as their services were needed by other, wealthier, families.

Finally, in 1901, the pair had saved enough money to purchase their own homestead near Verona, Virginia. However, the couple missed the life and seasons of upstate New York, and they returned to that area a few years later. Over the course of time, Anna had 10 children, but only 5 of them lived into adulthood. In 1927, Thomas died of a heart attack on their farm near Eagle Bridge, New York. He was 67. Anna never remarried, and, after trying to run the farm herself with the help of one of her sons, she sold off and moved into the house of one of her daughters in 1936 at age 76.

Now, most people Anna’s age would simply take it easy and enjoy her grandchildren and her “golden years” of retirement. Not Anna. All her life, no matter where her and Thomas moved, Anna made the house they lived in into a home with her decorating ability. She stitched, embroidered, painted, crafted, and created wonderful if simple depictions of the things she knew: Farming, the fields and woods, animals, houses, and children. In her retirement, she continued to create. Anna would re-use (we would say re-purpose today) items to make her objects, decorations, and even her medium. Professionals often call what Anna did “hobby art” as opposed to “folk art” because it has more in common with something done for oneself rather than for artistic or commercial reasons.

But, as happens to older people, especially those who worked their entire lives with their hands, arthritis set in. By her late 70s, Anna could no longer create embroidery or sew or even craft anymore, and it frustrated her. However, a relative made the suggestion that she continue to create using a large paintbrush, which, despite the arthritis, she could still wield. And, so, she did. And Anna continued to paint until near her death in 1961 at age 101. She would go on to paint hundreds of canvasses.

In 2006, one of her paintings sold for $1.2 million.

You know her as Grandma Moses.